In a conflict scenario, which strategy is characterized as a win-lose approach where speed is vital?

The strategy characterized as a win-lose approach where speed is vital is competing. This approach focuses on asserting one's own interests over others, aiming to achieve an objective quickly, often at the expense of others involved in the conflict. Competing frequently manifests in situations where there is a clear urgency, and an immediate decision needs to be made without prolonged discussions or negotiations.

In competitive scenarios, the individual or party seeks to prevail in the conflict, often viewing the situation as a zero-sum game where one party's gain is inherently another party's loss. This strategy is effective when quick decisions are necessary, such as in competitive environments or situations where time constraints do not allow for collaborative discussion or compromise.

The other strategies mentioned, such as collaborating or compromising, are more conducive to finding mutual solutions and fostering relationships, which may not be appropriate in time-sensitive situations where a decisive, individual win is required. Avoiding, on the other hand, entails sidestepping the conflict altogether, which does not align with the urgency implied in the question.